<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Environmental Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Environmental Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/5/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/6/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/78" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/106" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/9" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/2">
        <title>Occurrence of mental illness following prenatal and early childhood exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water: a retrospective cohort study
</title>
        <description>Background:
While many studies of adults with solvent exposure have shown increased risks of anxiety and depressive disorders, there is little information on the impact of prenatal and early childhood exposure on the subsequent risk of mental illness.  This retrospective cohort study examined whether early life exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water influenced the occurrence of depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia among adults from Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
Methods:
A total of 1,512 subjects born between 1969 and 1983 were studied, including 831 subjects with both prenatal and early childhood PCE exposure and 547 unexposed subjects.  Participants completed questionnaires to gather information on mental illnesses, demographic and medical characteristics, other sources of solvent exposure, and residences from birth through 1990. PCE exposure originating from the vinyl-liner of water distribution pipes was assessed using water distribution system modeling software that incorporated a leaching and transport algorithm.
Results:
No meaningful increases in risk ratios (RR) for depression were observed among subjects with prenatal and early childhood exposure (RR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.9-1.4). However, subjects with prenatal and early childhood exposure had a 1.8-fold increased risk of bipolar disorder (N=36 exposed cases, 95% CI: 0.9-1.4), a 1.5-fold increased risk post-traumatic stress disorder (N=47 exposed cases, 95% CI: 0.9-2.5), and a 2.1-fold increased risk of schizophrenia (N=3 exposed cases, 95% CI: 0.2-20.0). Further increases in the risk ratio were observed for bipolar disorder (N=18 exposed cases, RR; 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3-5.6) and post-traumatic stress disorder (N=18 exposed cases, RR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9-3.2) among subjects with the highest exposure levels.
Conclusions:
The results of this study provide evidence against an impact of early life exposure to PCE on the risk of depression. In contrast, the results provide support for an impact of early life exposure on the risk of bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. The number of schizophrenia cases was too small to draw reliable conclusions. These findings should be confirmed in investigations of other similarly exposed populations.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ann Aschengrau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janice Weinberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Janulewicz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Megan Romano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Gallagher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Winter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brett Martin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Veronica Vieira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Webster</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roberta White</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Ozonoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-2</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>PCE exposure in early life may affect mental health</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Early-life exposure to PCE-contaminated drinking water may increase the risk of developing bipolar disorder and post-traumatic distress disorder later in life.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/2">
        <title>Mercury from chlor-alkali plants: measured concentrations in food product sugar</title>
        <description>Mercury cell chlor-alkali products are used to produce thousands of other products including food ingredients such as citric acid, sodium benzoate, and high fructose corn syrup. High fructose corn syrup is used in food products to enhance shelf life. A pilot study was conducted to determine if high fructose corn syrup contains mercury, a toxic metal historically used as an anti-microbial. High fructose corn syrup samples were collected from three different manufacturers and analyzed for total mercury. The samples were found to contain levels of mercury ranging from below a detection limit of 0.005 to 0.570 micrograms mercury per gram of high fructose corn syrup. Average daily consumption of high fructose corn syrup is about 50 grams per person in the United States. With respect to total mercury exposure, it may be necessary to account for this source of mercury in the diet of children and sensitive populations.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Renee Dufault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blaise LeBlanc</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roseanne Schnoll</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Cornett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Schweitzer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lyn Patrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Hightower</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Wallinga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walter Lukiw</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2009, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-2</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Hidden mercury lurking in sweetner</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>High fructose corn syrup, produced using mercury cell chlor-alkali products, can contain up to 0.57 micrograms mercury per gram and this source may need to be considered when accounting for mercury in the diet.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-8-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/6">
        <title>The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review</title>
        <description>On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached a settlement with the Indian Government through mediation of that country&apos;s Supreme Court and accepted moral responsibility. It paid $470 million in compensation, a relatively small amount of based on significant underestimations of the long-term health consequences of exposure and the number of people exposed. The disaster indicated a need for enforceable international standards for environmental safety, preventative strategies to avoid similar accidents and industrial disaster preparedness.Since the disaster, India has experienced rapid industrialization. While some positive changes in government policy and behavior of a few industries have taken place, major threats to the environment from rapid and poorly regulated industrial growth remain. Widespread environmental degradation with significant adverse human health consequences continues to occur throughout India.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Edward Broughton</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2005, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-4-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/5/1/25">
        <title>Obesity, physical activity, and the urban environment: public health research needs</title>
        <description>Persistent trends in overweight and obesity have resulted in a rapid research effort focused on built environment, physical activity, and overweight. Much of the focus of this research has been on the design and form of suburbs. It suggests that several features of the suburban built environment such as low densities, poor street connectivity and the lack of sidewalks are associated with decreased physical activity and an increased risk of being overweight. But compared to suburban residents, inner city populations have higher rates of obesity and inactivity despite living in neighborhoods that are dense, have excellent street connectivity and who&apos;s streets are almost universally lined with sidewalks.We suggest that the reasons for this apparent paradox are rooted in the complex interaction of land use, infrastructure and social factors affecting inner city populations. Sometimes seemingly similar features are the result of very different processes, necessitating different policy responses to meet these challenges. For example, in suburbs, lower densities can result from government decision making that leads to restrictive zoning and land use issues. In the inner city, densities may be lowered because of abandonment and disinvestment. In the suburbs, changes in land use regulations could result in a healthier built environment. In inner cities, increasing densities will depend on reversing economic trends and investment decisions that have systematically resulted in distressed housing, abandoned buildings and vacant lots.These varying issues need to be further studied in the context of the totality of urban environments, incorporating what has been learned from other disciplines, such as economics and sociology, as well as highlighting some of the more successful inner city policy interventions, which may provide examples for communities working to improve their health.Certain disparities among urban and suburban populations in obesity and overweight, physical activity and research focus have emerged that are timely to address. Comparable research on the relationship of built environment and health is needed for urban, especially inner city, neighborhoods.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/5/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Russell Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>H. Patricia Hynes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2006, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-5-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-5-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/6/1/23">
        <title>Near-highway pollutants in motor vehicle exhaust: A review of epidemiologic evidence of cardiac and pulmonary health risks</title>
        <description>There is growing evidence of a distinct set of freshly-emitted air pollutants downwind from major highways, motorways, and freeways that include elevated levels of ultrafine particulates (UFP), black carbon (BC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and carbon monoxide (CO). People living or otherwise spending substantial time within about 200 m of highways are exposed to these pollutants more so than persons living at a greater distance, even compared to living on busy urban streets. Evidence of the health hazards of these pollutants arises from studies that assess proximity to highways, actual exposure to the pollutants, or both. Taken as a whole, the health studies show elevated risk for development of asthma and reduced lung function in children who live near major highways. Studies of particulate matter (PM) that show associations with cardiac and pulmonary mortality also appear to indicate increasing risk as smaller geographic areas are studied, suggesting localized sources that likely include major highways. Although less work has tested the association between lung cancer and highways, the existing studies suggest an association as well. While the evidence is substantial for a link between near-highway exposures and adverse health outcomes, considerable work remains to understand the exact nature and magnitude of the risks.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/6/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Doug Brugge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Durant</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Rioux</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2007, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-08-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-6-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-6-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-08-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/78">
        <title>Health Effects and Wind Turbines: A Review of the Literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Wind power has been harnessed as a source of power around the world. Debate is ongoing with respect to the relationship between reported health effects and wind turbines, specifically in terms of audible and inaudible noise. As a result, minimum setback distances have been established world-wide to reduce or avoid potential complaints from, or potential effects to, people living in proximity to wind turbines. People interested in this debate turn to two sources of information to make informed decisions: scientific peer-reviewed studies published in scientific journals and the popular literature and internet.
Methods:
The purpose of this paper is to review the peer-reviewed scientific literature, government agency reports, and the most prominent information found in the popular literature. Combinations of key words were entered into the Thomson Reuters Web of KnowledgeSM and the internet search engine Google. The review was conducted in the spirit of the evaluation process outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Results:
Conclusions of the peer reviewed literature differ in some ways from those in the popular literature. In peer reviewed studies, wind turbine annoyance has been statistically associated with wind turbine noise, but found to be more strongly related to visual impact, attitude to wind turbines and sensitivity to noise. To date, no peer reviewed articles demonstrate a direct causal link between people living in proximity to modern wind turbines, the noise they emit and resulting physiological health effects. If anything, reported health effects are likely attributed to a number of environmental stressors that result in an annoyed/stressed state in a segment of the population. In the popular literature, self-reported health outcomes are related to distance from turbines and the claim is made that infrasound is the causative factor for the reported effects, even though sound pressure levels are not measured.
Conclusions:
What both types of studies have in common is the conclusion that wind turbines can be a source of annoyance for some people. The difference between both types is the reason for annoyance. While it is acknowledged that noise from wind turbines can be annoying to some and associated with some reported health effects (e.g., sleep disturbance), especially when found at sound pressure levels greater than 40 db(A), given that annoyance appears to be more strongly related to visual cues and attitude than to noise itself, self reported health effects of people living near wind turbines are more likely attributed to physical manifestation from an annoyed state than from wind turbines themselves. In other words, it appears that it is the change in the environment that is associated with reported health effects and not a turbine-specific variable like audible noise or infrasound. Regardless of its cause, a certain level of annoyance in a population can be expected (as with any number of projects that change the local environment) and the acceptable level is a policy decision to be made by elected officials and their government representatives where the benefits of wind power are weighted against their cons. Assessing the effects of wind turbines on human health is an emerging field and conducting further research into the effects of wind turbines (and environmental changes) on human health, emotional and physical, is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/78</link>
                <dc:creator>Loren Knopper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Ollson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2011, null:78</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-10-78</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-10-78-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>78</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/4">
        <title>An ecological quantification of the relationships between water, sanitation and infant, child, and maternal mortality</title>
        <description>Background:
Water and sanitation access are known to be related to newborn, child, and maternal health. Our study attempts to quantify these relationships globally using country-level data: How much does improving access to water and sanitation influence infant, child, and maternal mortality?
Methods:
Data for 193 countries were abstracted from global databases (World Bank, WHO, and UNICEF). Linear regression was used for the outcomes of under-five mortality rate and infant mortality rate (IMR). These results are presented as events per 1000 live births. Ordinal logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios for the outcome of maternal mortality ratio (MMR).
Results:
Under-five mortality rate decreased by 1.17 (95%CI 1.08-1.26) deaths per 1000, p &lt; 0.001, for every quartile increase in population water access after adjustments for confounders. There was a similar relationship between quartile increase of sanitation access and under-five mortality rate, with a decrease of 1.66 (95%CI 1.11-1.32) deaths per 1000, p &lt; 0.001. Improved water access was also related to IMR, with the IMR decreasing by 1.14 (95%CI 1.05-1.23) deaths per 1000, p &lt; 0.001, with increasing quartile of access to improved water source. The significance of this relationship was retained with quartile improvement in sanitation access, where the decrease in IMR was 1.66 (95%CI 1.11-1.32) deaths per 1000, p &lt; 0.001. The estimated odds ratio that increased quartile of water access was significantly associated with increased quartile of MMR was 0.58 (95%CI 0.39-0.86), p = 0.008. The corresponding odds ratio for sanitation was 0.52 (95%CI 0.32-0.85), p = 0.009, both suggesting that better water and sanitation were associated with decreased MMR.
Conclusions:
Our analyses suggest that access to water and sanitation independently contribute to child and maternal mortality outcomes. If the world is to seriously address the Millennium Development Goals of reducing child and maternal mortality, then improved water and sanitation accesses are key strategies.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>June Cheng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Corinne Schuster-Wallace</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Watt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Newbold</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Mente</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/1">
        <title>Households&apos; Perception of Climate Change and Human Health Risks: A community perspective</title>
        <description>Background:
Bangladesh has been identified as one of the most vulnerable countries in the world concerning the adverse effects of climate change (CC). However, little is known about the perception of CC from the community, which is important for developing adaptation strategies.
Methods:
The study was a cross-sectional survey of respondents from two villages--one from the northern part and the other from the southern part of Bangladesh. A total of 450 households were selected randomly through multistage sampling completed a semi-structure questionnaire. This was supplemented with 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 15 key informant interviews (KIIs).
Results:
Over 95 percent of the respondents reported that the heat during the summers had increased and 80.2 percent reported that rainfall had decreased, compared to their previous experiences. Approximately 65 percent reported that winters were warmer than in previous years but they still experienced very erratic and severe cold during the winter for about 5-7 days, which restricted their activities with very destructive effect on agricultural production, everyday life and the health of people. FGDs and KIIs also reported that overall winters were warmer. Eighty point two percent, 72.5 percent and 54.7 percent survey respondents perceived that the frequency of water, heat and cold related diseases/health problems, respectively, had increased compared to five to ten years ago. FGDs and KIIs respondents were also reported the same.
Conclusions:
Respondents had clear perceptions about changes in heat, cold and rainfall that had occurred over the last five to ten years. Local perceptions of climate variability (CV) included increased heat, overall warmer winters, reduced rainfall and fewer floods. The effects of CV were mostly negative in terms of means of living, human health, agriculture and overall livelihoods. Most local perceptions on CV are consistent with the evidence regarding the vulnerability of Bangladesh to CC. Such findings can be used to formulate appropriate sector programs and interventions. The systematic collection of such information will allow scientists, researchers and policy makers to design and implement appropriate adaptation strategies for CC in countries that are especially vulnerable.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Md. Aminul Haque</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shelby Suzanne Yamamoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Azam Malik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rainer Sauerborn</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/106">
        <title>Childhood brain tumour risk and its association with wireless phones: a commentary </title>
        <description>Case-control studies on adults point to an increased risk of brain tumours (glioma and acoustic neuroma) associated with the long-term use of mobile phones. Recently, the first study on mobile phone use and the risk of brain tumours in children and adolescents, CEFALO, was published. It has been claimed that this relatively small study yielded reassuring results of no increased risk. We do not agree. We consider that the data contain several indications of increased risk, despite low exposure, short latency period, and limitations in the study design, analyses and interpretation. The information certainly cannot be used as reassuring evidence against an association, for reasons that we discuss in this commentary.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/106</link>
                <dc:creator>Fredrik Soderqvist</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Carlberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kjell Hansson Mild</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lennart Hardell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2011, null:106</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-10-106</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-10-106-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/9">
        <title>Knowns and unknowns on burden of disease due to chemicals: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
Continuous exposure to many chemicals, including through air, water, food, or other media and products results in health impacts which have been well assessed, however little is known about the total disease burden related to chemicals. This is important to know for overall policy actions and priorities. In this article the known burden related to selected chemicals or their mixtures, main data gaps, and the link to public health policy are reviewed.
Methods:
A systematic review of the literature for global burden of disease estimates from chemicals was conducted. Global disease due to chemicals was estimated using standard methodology of the Global Burden of Disease.
Results:
In total, 4.9 million deaths (8.3% of total) and 86 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) (5.7% of total) were attributable to environmental exposure and management of selected chemicals in 2004. The largest contributors include indoor smoke from solid fuel use, outdoor air pollution and second-hand smoke, with 2.0, 1.2 and 0.6 million deaths annually. These are followed by occupational particulates, chemicals involved in acute poisonings, and pesticides involved in self-poisonings, with 375,000, 240,000 and 186,000 annual deaths, respectively.
Conclusions:
The known burden due to chemicals is considerable. This information supports decision-making in programmes having a role to play in reducing human exposure to toxic chemicals. These figures present only a number of chemicals for which data are available, therefore, they are more likely an underestimate of the actual burden. Chemicals with known health effects, such as dioxins, cadmium, mercury or chronic exposure to pesticides could not be included in this article due to incomplete data and information. Effective public health interventions are known to manage chemicals and limit their public health impacts and should be implemented at national and international levels.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Annette Pruss-Ustun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Vickers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pascal Haefliger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roberto Bertollini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-10-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-10-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

