<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Environmental Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Environmental Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/33" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/31" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/30" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/28" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/27" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/24" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/33">
        <title>A measure for quantifying the impact of housing quality on respiratory health: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Damp and mould in homes have been established as risk factors for respiratory health. There is a need for a relatively straightforward assessment of the home that quantifies this risk.
Methods:
Using data from 891 New Zealand houses, the utility of a Respiratory Hazard Index quantifying key attributes related to damp and mould was tested by studying its associations with self-reported respiratory symptoms.
Results:
A dose-response relationship was found whereby each unit increase in the Respiratory Hazard Index was associated with an 11% increase in the odds of at least one episode of wheezing/whistling in the chest over the last 12 months (relative odds of 1.11 with a 95% CI 1.04%-1.20%). An 11% increase in the odds of an asthma attack over the last 12 months was estimated (relative odds of 1.11 with a 95% CI 1.01%-1.22%). These estimates were adjusted for household crowding levels, age, sex and smoking status. There was suggestive evidence of more steeply increasing odds of respiratory symptoms with increasing levels of the Respiratory Hazard Index for children aged under 7. In the worst performing houses according to the Index, a 33% reduction in the number of people experiencing respiratory symptoms (relative risk 0.67 with 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85) could be expected if people were housed in the best performing houses.
Conclusions:
This study showed that increased evidence of housing conditions supporting dampness and mould was associated with increased odds of respiratory symptoms. A valid housing assessment tool can provide a rational basis for investment in improved housing quality to improve respiratory health.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/33</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Keall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julian Crane</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Baker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kristin Wickens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philippa Howden-Chapman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Malcolm Cunningham</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:33</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-33</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-33-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/32">
        <title>The acceptability of rat trap use over pesticides for rodent control in two poor urban communities in South Africa</title>
        <description>Background:
Rodent infestations are a public health problem in poor urban communities. The use of illegal street pesticides to control rodent infestations with resulting poisonings is an additional public health concern receiving limited attention in many developing countries, including South Africa.
Methods:
Participants in a household intervention in two poor urban areas of Cape Town, South Africa, received two high quality rat traps. Reported in this article are the results of a follow-up survey conducted six months after distribution to assess community perceived acceptability of using rat traps instead of toxic pesticides (N = 175).
Results:
Of the 175 respondents that were followed up, 88% used the traps and only 35% continued using pesticides after the intervention. The analysis identified perceived effectiveness of the traps (prevalence odds ratio 18.00, 95% confidence interval 4.62 to 70.14), being male (prevalence odds ratio 8.86, 95% confidence interval 1.73 to 45.19), and the willingness to buy traps from an informal market (prevalence odds ratio 17.75, 95% confidence interval 4.22 to 74.57) as significantly associated with the acceptance of trap use.
Conclusions:
Rat traps, when introduced to poor urban communities, are acceptable as an alternative to toxic pesticides for rodent control. Sustainability of trap use, however, needs to be researched, especially cost and cost-benefit.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Rifqah Roomaney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rodney Ehrlich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanna-Andrea Rother</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-32</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-32-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/31">
        <title>Effects of arsenic exposure on DNA methylation in cord blood samples from newborn babies and in a human lymphoblast cell line</title>
        <description>Background:
Accumulating evidence indicates that in utero exposure to arsenic is associated with congenital defects and long-term disease consequences including cancers. Recent studies suggest that arsenic carcinogenesis results from epigenetic changes, particularly in DNA methylation. This study aimed to investigate DNA methylation changes as a result of arsenic exposure in utero and in vitro.
Methods:
For the exposure in utero study, a total of seventy-one newborns (fifty-five arsenic-exposed and sixteen unexposed newborns) were recruited. Arsenic concentrations in the drinking water were measured, and exposure in newborns was assessed by measurement of arsenic concentrations in cord blood, nails and hair by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). In the in vitro study, human lymphoblasts were treated with arsenite at 0-100 muM for two, four and eight hours (short-term) and at 0, 0.5 and 1.0 muM for eight-weeks period (long-term). DNA methylation was analyzed in cord blood lymphocytes and lymphoblasts treated with arsenite in vitro. Global DNA methylation was determined as LINE-1 methylation using combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) and total 5-methyldeoxycytidine (5MedC) content which was determined by HPLC-MS/MS. Methylation of p53 was determined at the promoter region using methylation-specific restriction endonuclease digestion with MspI and HpaII.
Results:
Results showed that arsenic-exposed newborns had significantly higher levels of arsenic in cord blood, fingernails, toenails and hair than those of the unexposed subjects and a slight increase in promoter methylation of p53 in cord blood lymphocytes which significantly correlated with arsenic accumulation in nails (p &lt; 0.05) was observed, while LINE-1 methylation was unchanged. Short-term in vitro arsenite treatment in lymphoblastoid cells clearly demonstrated a significant global hypomethylation, determined as reduction in LINE-1 methylation and total 5-MedC content, and p53 hypermethylation (p &lt; 0.05). However, a slight LINE-1 hypomethylation and transient p53 promoter hypermethylation were observed following long-term in vitro treatment.
Conclusions:
This study provides an important finding that in utero arsenic exposure affects DNA methylation, particularly at the p53 promoter region, which may be linked to the mechanism of arsenic carcinogenesis and the observed increased incidence of cancer later in life.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/31</link>
                <dc:creator>Ponpat Intarasunanont</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Panida Navasumrit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Somchamai Woraprasit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Krittinee Chaisatra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Suk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chulabhorn Mahidol</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mathuros Ruchirawat</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:31</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-31</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-31-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/30">
        <title>Portrait of the journal as a young adult</title>
        <description>Since its founding a decade ago, Environmental Health has received more than one thousand manuscripts. Last year marked the first time we published over 100 articles. The journal web site currently receives over 60,000 unique visitors every month, and the steady increase suggests that the number will soon exceed 100,000 monthly. Individual articles are usually accessed several thousand times within a few years of publication, the highest number for a single paper being close to 100,000. The access numbers suggest that the journal has a reach that goes much beyond narrow academic circles as represented by numbers of citations in scholarly journals. To further the goal of reaching the wider public health community and linking to environmental health promotion, we ask prospective Environmental Health authors to highlight the findings that are new or different along with the implications for future research and in terms of prevention of environmental hazards.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/30</link>
                <dc:creator>Philippe Grandjean</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Ozonoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:30</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-30</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-30-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/29">
        <title>Correcting for the influence of sampling conditions on biomarkers of exposure to phenols and phthalates: a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals</title>
        <description>Background:
Environmental epidemiology and biomonitoring studies typically rely on biological samples to assay the concentration of non-persistent exposure biomarkers. Between-participant variations in sampling conditions of these biological samples constitute a potential source of exposure misclassification. Few studies attempted to correct biomarker levels for this error. We aimed to assess the influence of sampling conditions on concentrations of urinary biomarkers of select phenols and phthalates, two widely-produced families of chemicals, and to standardize biomarker concentrations on sampling conditions.
Methods:
Urine samples were collected between 2002 and 2006 among 287 pregnant women from Eden and Pelagie cohorts, from which phthalates and phenols metabolites levels were assayed. We applied a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals. First, the influence of sampling conditions (including sampling hour, duration of storage before freezing) and of creatinine levels on biomarker concentrations were characterized using adjusted linear regression models. In the second step, the model estimates were used to remove the variability in biomarker concentrations due to sampling conditions and to standardize concentrations as if all samples had been collected under the same conditions (e.g., same hour of urine collection).
Results:
Sampling hour was associated with concentrations of several exposure biomarkers. After standardization for sampling conditions, median concentrations differed by 38 % for 2,5-dichlorophenol to +80 % for a metabolite of diisodecyl phthalate. However, at the individual level, standardized biomarker levels were strongly correlated (correlation coefficients above 0.80) with unstandardized measures.
Conclusions:
Sampling conditions, such as sampling hour, should be systematically collected in biomarker-based studies, in particular when the biomarker half-life is short. The 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals that we proposed in order to limit the impact of heterogeneity in sampling conditions could be further tested in studies describing levels of biomarkers or their influence on health.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Marion Mortamais</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecile Chevrier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire Philippat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire Petit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonia Calafat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xiaoyun Ye</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manori Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Brambilla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marinus Eijkemans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie-Aline Charles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sylvaine Cordier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Remy Slama</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-29</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-29-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/28">
        <title>Complex organochlorine pesticide mixtures as determinant factor for breast cancer risk: a population-based case-control study in the Canary Islands (Spain)</title>
        <description>Background:
All the relevant risk factors contributing to breast cancer etiology are not fully known. Exposure to organochlorine pesticides has been linked to an increased incidence of the disease, although not all data have been consistent. Most published studies evaluated the exposure to organochlorines individually, ignoring the potential effects exerted by the mixtures of chemicals.
Methods:
This population-based study was designed to evaluate the profile of mixtures of organochlorines detected in 103 healthy women and 121 women diagnosed with breast cancer from Gran Canaria Island, and the relation between the exposure to these compounds and breast cancer risk.
Results:
The most prevalent mixture of organochlorines among healthy women was the combination of lindane and endrin, and this mixture was not detected in any affected women. Breast cancer patients presented more frequently a combination of aldrin, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD), and this mixture was not found in any healthy woman. After adjusting for covariables, the risk of breast cancer was moderately associated with DDD (OR = 1.008, confidence interval 95% 1.001-1.015, p = 0.024).
Conclusions:
This study indicates that healthy women show a very different profile of organochlorine pesticide mixtures than breast cancer patients, suggesting that organochlorine pesticide mixtures could play a relevant role in breast cancer risk.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/28</link>
                <dc:creator>Luis Boada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Zumbado</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luis Alberto Henriquez-Hernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maira Almeida-Gonzalez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eva Alvarez-Leon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lluis Serra-Majem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Octavio Luzardo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:28</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-28</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-28-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/27">
        <title>Perceived annoyance from environmental odors and association with atmospheric ammonia levels in non-urban residential communities: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>ObjectiveOdor exposure is an environmental stressor that is responsible of many citizens complains about air pollution in non-urban areas. However, information about the exposure-response relation is scarce. One of the main challenges is to identify a measurable compound that can be related with odor annoyance responses. We investigated the association between regional and temporal variation of ammonia (NH3) concentrations in five Danish non-urban regions and environmental odor annoyance as perceived by the local residents.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study where NH3 concentration was obtained from the national air quality monitoring program and from emission-dispersion modelling, and odor pollution perception from questionnaires. The exposure-response model was a sigmoid model. Linear regression analyses were used to estimate the model constants after equation transformations. The model was validated using leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) statistical method.
Results:
About 45% of the respondents were annoyed by odor pollution at their residential areas. The perceived odor was characterized by all respondents as animal waste odor. The exposure-annoyance sigmoid model showed that the prevalence of odor annoyance was significantly associated with NH3 concentrations (measured and estimated) at the local air quality monitoring stations (p &lt; 0.01,R2 = 0.99; and p &lt; 0.05,R2 = 0.93; respectively). Prediction errors were below 5.1% and 20% respectively. The seasonal pattern of odor perception was associated with the seasonal variation in NH3 concentrations (p &lt; 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.68).
Conclusion:
The results suggest that atmospheric NH3 levels at local air quality stations could be used as indicators of prevalence of odor annoyance in non-urban residential communities.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/27</link>
                <dc:creator>Victoria Blanes-Vidal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Esmaeil Nadimi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Ellermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helle Andersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Per Løfstrøm</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-27</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-27-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/26">
        <title>Possible effects of changes in the meteorological state over semi-arid areas on the general well-being of weather-sensitive patients</title>
        <description>Background:
The influence of the changes in atmospheric states, typical for areas close to big deserts, on general well-being of hypertensive persons was analyzed.
Methods:
Under test was the group of 20 hypertensive weather-sensitive patients; their blood pressure, pulse rate and appearance of 4 symptoms of discomfort sensations: arthritic pain, unjustified anxiety, severe headache and inexplicable tiredness- were registered. Symptoms are classified in ICD-9 code (780-790) and scored on a 4-point scale.Results were defined as positive (no departure from the range of normal values) or problematic; the daily number of the latter results was collected under the name &quot;pathological reactions&quot; NPR if at least two of these 7 checked symptoms (of one patient) were outside the normal range. Comparison of the current weather conditions with their means, questioning of patients and repeated examinations are used to gain information. The data was analyzed employing the SAS statistical software. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used, applied on the best and worst days, when a minimum and a maximum of pathological changes NPR in the patients&apos; well-being were observed. The statistical significance was p &lt; 0.05 in all cases.
Results:
~1500 medical observations and verbal statements were registered in the Primary Care Clinic (Be&apos;er-Sheva, Israel) during 2001-2002. No meaning correlation was found between NPR and absolute values of temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure. Variations in wind speed WS and direction were expressed in blood pressure changes and in exacerbation of discomfort of various degrees. Unfavorable conditions correspond to days with dominant desert air streams and to high WS, when NPR reaches 85.7%; during the days with prevalent sea breeze NPR was [less than or equal to]22.9%. The role of wind direction in NPR occurrence is prevalent when WS &gt; 4 ms-1. The Spearman test gives higher correlation than Pearson test (rho ~ 0.14, p &lt; 0.03 against rho ~ 0.1, p &lt; 0.04).
Conclusions:
NPR is more affected by the air streams than by absolute values of meteorological parameters. The method of this study might give to family doctors some additional tools to predict deterioration in general feelings of chronic patients and could be related to other health problems influenced by the meteorological environment.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Naomy Yackerson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ljuba Bromberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Batiah Adler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexander Aizenberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-26</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/25">
        <title>Exposures to fine particulate air pollution and respiratory outcomes in adults using two national datasets: a cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Relationships between chronic exposures to air pollution and respiratory health outcomes have yet to be clearly articulated for adults. Recent data from nationally representative surveys suggest increasing disparity by race/ethnicity regarding asthma-related morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the relationship between annual average ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations and respiratory outcomes for adults using modeled air pollution and health outcome data and to examine PM2.5 sensitivity across race/ethnicity.
Methods:
Respondents from the 2002-2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were linked to annual kriged PM2.5 data from the USEPA AirData system. Logistic regression was employed to investigate increases in ambient PM2.5 concentrations and self-reported prevalence of respiratory outcomes including asthma, sinusitis and chronic bronchitis. Models included health, behavioral, demographic and resource-related covariates. Stratified analyses were conducted by race/ethnicity.
Results:
Of nearly 110,000 adult respondents, approximately 8,000 and 4,000 reported current asthma and recent attacks, respectively. Overall, odds ratios (OR) for current asthma (0.97 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.87-1.07)) and recent attacks (0.90 (0.78-1.03)) did not suggest an association with a 10 mug/m3 increase in PM2.5. Stratified analyses revealed significant associations for non-Hispanic blacks [OR = 1.73 (1.17-2.56) for current asthma and OR = 1.76 (1.07-2.91) for recent attacks] but not for Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. Significant associations were observed overall (1.18 (1.08-1.30)) and in non-Hispanic whites (1.31 (1.18-1.46)) for sinusitis, but not for chronic bronchitis.
Conclusions:
Non-Hispanic blacks may be at increased sensitivity of asthma outcomes from PM2.5 exposure. Increased chronic PM2.5 exposures in adults may contribute to population sinusitis burdens.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Keeve Nachman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Parker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/24">
        <title>Mitigation of building-related polychlorinated biphenyls in indoor air of a school</title>
        <description>Background:
Sealants and other building materials sold in the U.S. from 1958 - 1971 were commonly manufactured with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at percent quantities by weight. Volatilization of PCBs from construction materials has been reported to produce PCB levels in indoor air that exceed health protective guideline values. The discovery of PCBs in indoor air of schools can produce numerous complications including disruption of normal operations and potential risks to health. Understanding the dynamics of building-related PCBs in indoor air is needed to identify effective strategies for managing potential exposures and risks. This paper reports on the efficacy of selected engineering controls implemented to mitigate concentrations of PCBs in indoor air.
Methods:
Three interventions (ventilation, contact encapsulation, and physical barriers) were evaluated in an elementary school with PCB-containing caulk and elevated PCB concentrations in indoor air. Fluorescent light ballasts did not contain PCBs. Following implementation of the final intervention, measurements obtained over 14 months were used to assess the efficacy of the mitigation methods over time as well as temporal variability of PCBs in indoor air.
Results:
Controlling for air exchange rates and temperature, the interventions produced statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05) reductions in concentrations of PCBs in indoor air of the school. The mitigation measures remained effective over the course of the entire follow-up period. After all interventions were implemented, PCB levels in indoor air were associated with indoor temperature. In a &quot;broken-stick&quot; regression model with a node at 20&#176;C, temperature explained 79% of the variability of indoor PCB concentrations over time (p &lt; 0.001).
Conclusions:
Increasing outdoor air ventilation, encapsulating caulk, and constructing a physical barrier over the encapsulated material were shown to be effective at reducing exposure concentrations of PCBs in indoor air of a school and also preventing direct contact with PCB caulk. In-place management methods such as these avoid the disruption and higher costs of demolition, disposal and reconstruction required when PCB-containing building materials are removed from a school. Because of the influence of temperature on indoor air PCB levels, risk assessment results based on short-term measurements, e.g., a single day or season, may be erroneous and could lead to sub-optimal allocation of resources.</description>
        <link>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>David MacIntosh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Taeko Minegishi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Fragala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Allen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Coghlan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Stewart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John McCarthy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Environmental Health 2012, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1476-069X-11-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1476-069X-11-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Environmental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1476-069X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

