<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1476-069X-9-6</ui>
   <ji>1476-069X</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and reduced birth size: a prospective birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au ca="yes" id="A1">
               <snm>Ballester</snm>
               <fnm>Ferran</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <insr iid="I3"/>
               <email>ballester_fer@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Estarlich</snm>
               <fnm>Marisa</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>estarlich_mar@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>I&#241;iguez</snm>
               <fnm>Carmen</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>inyiguez_car@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Llop</snm>
               <fnm>Sabrina</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>llop_sab@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Ram&#243;n</snm>
               <fnm>Rosa</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <insr iid="I4"/>
               <email>ramon_rosbon@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>Esplugues</snm>
               <fnm>Ana</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>esplugues_ana@gva.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A7">
               <snm>Lacasa&#241;a</snm>
               <fnm>Marina</fnm>
               <insr iid="I5"/>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>marina.lacasana.easp@juntadeandalucia.es</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A8">
               <snm>Rebagliato</snm>
               <fnm>Marisa</fnm>
               <insr iid="I6"/>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>rebagli@umh.es</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Center for Public Health Research (CSISP), Conselleria de Sanitat, Avda Catalunya 21, 46020, Valencia, Spain</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Doctor Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I3">
               <p>School of Nursing, Universitat de Val&#232;ncia, C Jaume Roig s/n 46010, Valencia, Spain</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I4">
               <p>General Directorate of Public Health. Conselleria de Sanitat, Avda Catalunya 21, 46020, Valencia, Spain</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I5">
               <p>Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Campus de la Cartuja s/n, Granada, Spain</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I6">
               <p>Department of Public Health, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922, Alcorc&#243;n, Madrid, Spain</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Environmental Health</source>
         <issn>1476-069X</issn>
         <pubdate>2010</pubdate>
         <volume>9</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>6</fpage>
         <url>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/9/1/6</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">20113501</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-069X-9-6</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>23</day>
               <month>10</month>
               <year>2009</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>29</day>
               <month>1</month>
               <year>2010</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>29</day>
               <month>1</month>
               <year>2010</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2010</year>
         <collab>Ballester et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>Maternal exposure to air pollution has been related to fetal growth in a number of recent scientific studies. The objective of this study was to assess the association between exposure to air pollution during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth in a cohort in Valencia, Spain.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Methods</p>
               </st>
               <p>Seven hundred and eighty-five pregnant women and their singleton newborns participated in the study. Exposure to ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) was estimated by means of land use regression. NO<sub>2 </sub>spatial estimations were adjusted to correspond to relevant pregnancy periods (whole pregnancy and trimesters) for each woman. Outcome variables were birth weight, length, and head circumference (HC), along with being small for gestational age (SGA). The association between exposure to residential outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>and outcomes was assessed controlling for potential confounders and examining the shape of the relationship using generalized additive models (GAM).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>For continuous anthropometric measures, GAM indicated a change in slope at NO<sub>2 </sub>concentrations of around 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>. NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure >40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>during the first trimester was associated with a change in birth length of -0.27 cm (95% CI: -0.51 to -0.03) and with a change in birth weight of -40.3 grams (-96.3 to 15.6); the same exposure throughout the whole pregnancy was associated with a change in birth HC of -0.17 cm (-0.34 to -0.003). The shape of the relation was seen to be roughly linear for the risk of being SGA. A 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>increase in NO<sub>2 </sub>during the second trimester was associated with being SGA-weight, odds ratio (OR): 1.37 (1.01-1.85). For SGA-length the estimate for the same comparison was OR: 1.42 (0.89-2.25).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusions</p>
               </st>
               <p>Prenatal exposure to traffic-related air pollution may reduce fetal growth. Findings from this study provide further evidence of the need for developing strategies to reduce air pollution in order to prevent risks to fetal health and development.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>In recent years a growing body of epidemiological research has focused on the potential impact of prenatal exposure to air pollution on birth outcomes. Several outcomes have been related to exposure to air pollution during pregnancy, including low birth weight, reduced birth size, and intrauterine growth retardation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. Moreover, reduction in fetal growth has been associated with poor neurological development as well as with an increased risk for chronic diseases later in life <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>A cohort study is the design of choice for evaluating the impact of air pollution on fetal growth as pregnancy is a process in which the relationship between a given type of exposure and an associated effect may be observed in a limited period of time <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Some of the studies carried out on this topic have included large populations using birth data from health care registries <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp> whereas other cohort studies had smaller samples, but more detailed, primary data <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. Authors of recent methodological reviews <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp> agree that new prospective studies should allow for adequate assessment of air pollution exposure, consider different time windows of exposure, and collect sufficient information on confounding variables.</p>
         <p>Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) is the air pollutant most frequently used as a surrogate for traffic-related pollution in prospective studies, both in adults and in children <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. This is due to the fact that outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>levels correlate well with pollutants generated by traffic, they can be easily measured using passive samplers, and they are routinely measured by air quality networks, which allows for correction for seasonality.</p>
         <p>The INMA study (Spanish Children's Health and Environment) is a prospective multi-centre pregnancy and birth cohort study that seeks to evaluate the role of the environment on fetal development and children's health in the general population in Spain <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. The objective of this report is to assess the association between residential exposure to outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Study design and population</p>
            </st>
            <p>The present study was based on data from the INMA cohort in Valencia. Between November 2003 and June 2005, 855 pregnant women attending the prenatal population-based screening program at the reference hospital were included in the study. Thirty-five of these women had a spontaneous abortion or fetal death, 33 withdrew from the study or were lost to follow up, and 787 delivered a live, singleton infant. Exposure to outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>was assessed for 785 of the 787 mother-child pairs in the study, thus making up the final study population. Deliveries took place between May 2004 and February 2006. The study area covered the home addresses of all participants. Approximately 10% lived in a typically urban zone (city of Valencia), 50% lived in the metropolitan zone, 35% in a semi-urban zone, and the rest in a typically rural zone. The study area covers 1372 km<sup>2 </sup>including 34 municipalities and has a reference population of almost 300,000 inhabitants with a broad socio-demographic and environmental heterogeneity. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the reference hospital and informed consent was obtained from every participating woman. The mothers' recruitment and follow up procedures have been previously reported <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Birth outcome assessment</p>
            </st>
            <p>Outcome variables were birth weight (in grams), birth length and head circumference (in centimetres). Birth weight was measured by the midwife that attended the birth, whereas birth length and head circumference were measured by a nurse when the newborn arrived in the hospital ward within the first twelve hours of life. The three measures were standardized for gestational age and sex using the residuals method <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. An early ultrasound of the crown-rump length was also available and used for gestational dating when the difference with the last menstrual period was equal to or greater than 7 days. This happened in 11.9% of the cases. We defined small for gestational age (SGA) as a birth weight or length below the 10<sup>th </sup>percentile according to standard percentile charts for sex and gestational age in the Spanish population <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. We did not classify SGA in terms of head circumference because our measurement procedure was different from that used in the published charts. Of all the births, 6.4% were classified as preterm births (i.e. gestational age &lt; 37 weeks) in the studied cohort.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Assessment of air pollution exposure</p>
            </st>
            <p>A procedure was designed to assess individual exposure to NO<sub>2 </sub>as a marker of outdoor air pollution considering both spatial and temporal variations on exposure. Ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>concentrations for 93 sampling points covering the study area were obtained using radial symmetry passive samplers (Radiello<sup>&#174;</sup>, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Padua/Italy) which remained exposed for four sampling periods of 7 days each. The campaigns took place in April, June, and November 2004 and February 2005. The passive samplers were distributed over the area according to geometrical criteria, taking into account the expected pollution gradients and the expected number of births (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). For obtaining estimates of the NO<sub>2 </sub>spatial distribution in the study area, a two step approach was used. First, universal kriging was used to predict NO<sub>2 </sub>levels at unmonitored sites, i.e. the women's residences. Then, geographical information system (GIS) data (traffic, i.e. vehicle density and distance to a main road, land use, and altitude) were used to improve predictions with the aid of land use regression (LUR).</p>
            <fig id="F1">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Spatial distribution of the NO<sub>2 </sub>levels in the study area and addresses of the women in the cohort</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Spatial distribution of the NO<sub>2 </sub>levels in the study area and addresses of the women in the cohort</b>.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1476-069X-9-6-1" hint_layout="single"/>
            </fig>
            <p>In addition, in order to take into account temporal variations in exposure, we used daily information from seven stations of the monitoring network within 5 km or less of the study area to adjust NO<sub>2 </sub>spatial estimations to correspond with the pregnancy period for each woman. Thus, the NO<sub>2 </sub>spatial estimation for each woman's residence was multiplied by the ratio between the NO<sub>2 </sub>monitoring network average during the pregnancy period of that particular woman divided by the NO<sub>2 </sub>monitoring network average for the entire study period. In order to explore critical exposure windows, an air pollution exposure indicator for each trimester of pregnancy was constructed using the same procedure as that utilized for the entire pregnancy. Address changes were taken into consideration when they accounted for a relevant fraction of each exposure window (>2/9). The methodology and results for assignment of personal air pollution exposure have been described elsewhere <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Covariates and potential confounders</p>
            </st>
            <p>The mothers completed a detailed questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, environmental exposures, and life style variables twice during their pregnancy (weeks 10-13 and 28-32). The questionnaires were administered during personal interviews by previously trained interviewers. Potential confounders included maternal variables (see Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>), infant's sex, paternal height, and season of delivery. Body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain were further classified following the Institute of Medicine guidelines <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Socio-economic status (SES) was classified using an adaptation of the British SES classification. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure was assessed as both passive exposure at home and global exposure.</p>
            <suppl id="S1">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 1</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Characteristics of pregnant women and their association with birth outcomes in the INMA-Valencia cohort, 2003-2006</b>. Table with the distribution of the outcome variables among the categories of the covariates at study.</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1476-069X-9-6-S1.DOC">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Statistical Methods</p>
            </st>
            <p>We first performed bivariate analysis to determine parental and pregnancy characteristics associated with birth outcomes. We also examined individual NO<sub>2 </sub>levels and maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Association between exposure to residential outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>and anthropometric measures was assessed by means of linear regression for continuous variables and logistic regression for SGA. In order to avoid excessive influence of extreme values, robust methods were applied. For continuous variables, we checked for the shape of the relation using graphical smoothing techniques. The height of both parents showed a linear relation and was therefore included as a continuous variable in the models. The rest of the continuous variables were categorized to account for non-linear associations. Covariates were retained in the final model if they were related to the outcome based on likelihood ratio (LR) tests with a <it>p </it>value of &lt; 0.10 or if they changed effect estimates for the exposure of interest by > = 10% when excluded from the model. The mother's age was included in all models in spite of its statistical significance. Zone of residence was not included in the multivariate analyses because it was highly correlated with NO<sub>2 </sub>levels. To assess the shape of the relationship between measures at birth and NO<sub>2 </sub>levels, we used adjusted GAM models to evaluate the linearity of the relation between NO<sub>2 </sub>levels and the reproductive outcomes, comparing models with NO<sub>2 </sub>levels in a linear and non-linear manner (a cubic smoothing spline with 2, 3, and 4 degrees of freedom) by means of graphical examination and an LR test (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Characteristics of the newborns, the mothers and their pregnancy, and the fathers' height in relation to size measures and SGA are described in Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>. In brief, older mothers, mothers who had higher pre-pregnancy weight and/or BMI, who were taller, of higher social class, non-smokers, and of Latin American origin had infants with a higher birth weight and a lower proportion of SGA (in weight) babies. Primiparous mothers, those with low weight gain, those with only primary school education, and those who still smoked at week 12 had infants with a lower birth weight and a higher proportion of SGA (in weight) babies. Boys weighed more than girls. Similar patterns were found for birth length and head circumference adjusted for gestational age, and for SGA (in length) except that there were no differences by country of origin, and in the case of length, no differences by either social class or education were observed. Finally, taller fathers had bigger babies and a lower proportion of SGA babies.</p>
         <p>The spatial distribution of NO<sub>2 </sub>levels throughout the study area showed a gradient from the urban zone to the rural one with the two motorways crossing the area playing an important role (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). The mean residential outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>level corresponding to the 785 pregnancy periods was 36.9 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>(Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>). For 43.2% of the women, the outdoor NO<sub>2 </sub>levels at their residences during the pregnancy period were above 40 &#956;g/m3, the World Health Organization guideline for annual NO<sub>2 </sub>concentration <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. Individual NO<sub>2 </sub>levels for each trimester correlated well with NO<sub>2 </sub>levels for the whole pregnancy, and moderately between themselves (Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>).</p>
         <tbl id="T1">
            <title>
               <p>Table 1</p>
            </title>
            <caption>
               <p>Descriptive statistics of the estimates of individual exposure to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>during the different pregnancy periods.</p>
            </caption>
            <tblbdy cols="8">
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>
                        <b>Pregnancy period</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>Mean (&#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center" cspan="3">
                     <p>
                        <b>Percentiles (&#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center" cspan="3">
                     <p>
                        <b>Pearson's correlation (r) between periods</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c cspan="6">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>25</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>50</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>75</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>First trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>Second trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>
                        <b>Third trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="8">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>
                        <b>First trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>37.9</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>28.2</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>38.1</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>48.5</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="8">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>
                        <b>Second trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>35.9</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>26.5</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>35.2</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>44.2</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.69*</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="8">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>
                        <b>Third trimester</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>37.0</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>27.3</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>37.0</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>46.1</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.34*</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.65*</p>
                  </c>
                  <c>
                     <p/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c cspan="8">
                     <hr/>
                  </c>
               </r>
               <r>
                  <c ca="left">
                     <p>
                        <b>Whole pregnancy</b>
                     </p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>36.9</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>29.4</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>37.9</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>45.6</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.80*</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.92*</p>
                  </c>
                  <c ca="center">
                     <p>0.83*</p>
                  </c>
               </r>
            </tblbdy>
            <tblfn>
               <p>*p &lt; 0.001</p>
               <p>
                  <b>INMA-Valencia cohort, 2003-2006</b>
               </p>
            </tblfn>
         </tbl>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Air pollution exposure and anthropometric measures</p>
            </st>
            <p>Unadjusted analysis considering the variables in their continuous form showed a negative relationship between individual exposures to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>and anthropometric measures at birth (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). This relation was statistically significant for first trimester exposure and for both birth length and head circumference, as well as for second trimester exposure and head circumference. After adjustment for covariates and potential confounders, the same temporal pattern persisted (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Although 95% confidence intervals yielded results that do not reject the null hypothesis, birth head circumference and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure in the first trimester were marginally associated. Specifically, an increase in 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>in NO<sub>2 </sub>levels during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with a decrease in head circumference by -0.07 cm (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.005).</p>
            <tbl id="T2">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Association between individual exposure to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="13">
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="4">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth weight (in g)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:785)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="4">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth length (in cm)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:784)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="4">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth head circumference (in cm)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:782)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure period</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Linearity (df)<sup>b</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Linearity (df)<sup>b</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Linearity (df)<sup>b</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Unadjusted</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-3.564</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-23.698;16.570)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.092</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.177;-0.008)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (4)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.069</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.133;-0.004)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-4.464</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-25.175;16.248)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.050</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.137;0.037)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (2)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.071</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.137;-0.004)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-5.740</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-26.553;15.072)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.010</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.096;0.077)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (4)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.017</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.084;0.049)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-5.792</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-30.065;18.481)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.063</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.165;0.038)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.074</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.152;0.003)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Adjusted<sup>c</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-12.782</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-34.537;8.972)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.066</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.149;0.017)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (4)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.066</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.137;0.005)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-9.961</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-32.594;12.671)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (4)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.040</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.125;0.044)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.060</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.133;0.014)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-4.294</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-25.923;17.335)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.005</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.089;0.079)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (2)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.028</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.099;0.042)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="13">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-9.729</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-33.218;13.760)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.047</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.146;0.052)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL(2)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.058</p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.134;0.018)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>NL (3)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p>* Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures for a 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>increase in the mean NO<sub>2 </sub>levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.</p>
                  <p><sup>a </sup>Standardized for gestational age.</p>
                  <p><sup>b </sup>Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO<sub>2 </sub>in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).</p>
                  <p><sup>c </sup>Adjusted for:</p>
                  <p>-Birth weight = maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
                  <p>-Birth length = maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the first trimester, country of origin, and sex of the infant.</p>
                  <p>-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <p>When the shape of the relation between NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure and anthropometric measures was assessed, a non-linear relationship was observed. In most cases in the multivariate analysis, the best fit was obtained when NO<sub>2 </sub>was introduced as a cubic smoothing spline with 3 or 4 degrees of freedom (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Graphic examination of the relation between NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the first trimester and birth weight and length, and between NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the second trimester and head circumference suggested a change in slope around 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>(Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). For this reason, the association between NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure and weight, length, and head circumference at birth was also analyzed considering NO<sub>2 </sub>as a categorical variable, i.e. >40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>versus &#8804;40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>(Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure above 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>during the first trimester was associated with a reduction in birth length of -0.27 cm (95%CI -0.51 to -0.03). Birth weight was just marginally associated with NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure; i.e. a reduction of -40.3 grams in birth weight (95%CI: -96.3 to 15.6) for the same comparison. Also a significant reduction in head circumference was found for exposures above 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>throughout the entire pregnancy.</p>
            <tbl id="T3">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Association between individual exposure to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>>40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="7">
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="2">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth weight (in g)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:785)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="2">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth length (in cm)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:784)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="2">
                        <p>
                           <b>Birth head circumference (in cm)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:782)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure period</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>&#946;</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Unadjusted</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-24.309</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-78.256; 29.638)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.300</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.526; -0.075)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.104</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.276; 0.069)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-9.648</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-65.156; 45.860)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.100</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.333; 0.133)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.173</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.352; 0.005)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>28.325</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-26.475; 83.126)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.150</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.079; 0.379)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.051</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.123; 0.226)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-16.912</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-71.233; 37.410)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.170</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.398; 0.058)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.152</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.326; 0.022)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Adjusted<sup>b</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-40.349</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-96.267; 15.568)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.271</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.514; -0.028)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.074</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.257; 0.108)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-37.546</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-96.231; 21.140)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.190</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.447; 0.066)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.177</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.368; 0.014)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>26.656</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-28.239; 81.551)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.077</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.161; 0.315)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.011</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.167; 0.190)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-33.292</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-84.874; 18.290)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.199</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.424; 0.027)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>-0.171</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(-0.339; -0.003)</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p>*Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures comparing NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure levels >40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>vs. exposure levels &#8804;40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>at each woman residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.</p>
                  <p><sup>a </sup>Standardized for gestational age.</p>
                  <p><sup>b </sup>Adjusted for:</p>
                  <p>-Birth weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
                  <p>-Birth length: maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal working status in the first trimester, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
                  <p>-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the third trimester, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Relationship between individual NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the first trimester and anthropometric measures at birth</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Relationship between individual NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the first trimester and anthropometric measures at birth</b>. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). (A). Birth weight (gr) and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure (3 df) B). Birth length (cm) and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure (4 df). (C). Birth head circumference (cm) and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure (4 df). <it>Footnote for Figure 2(C)</it>: For birth head circumference the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1476-069X-9-6-2" hint_layout="single"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Analysis of the relationship with small for gestational age (SGA)</p>
            </st>
            <p>In the bivariate analysis, although all the odds ratios (OR) were higher than 1, no significant association was found for either of the two measures of SGA and exposure to NO<sub>2 </sub>during pregnancy (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). After adjustment for potential confounders, a clearer association emerged with the second trimester being the most relevant window of exposure. A 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>increase in NO<sub>2 </sub>during the second trimester was thus associated with the risk of SGA-weight, OR: 1.37 (95%CI: 1.01-1.85). For SGA-length the association estimate for the same comparison was OR: 1.42 (95%CI: 0.89-2.25). No significant improvement in the model was obtained with non-linear models for SGA (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>); therefore, we have only included the results for the relationship with NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure as a continuous variable (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>).</p>
            <tbl id="T4">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 4</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Association between individual exposure to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>in different time periods during pregnancy and Small for Gestational Age (SGA).*</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="7">
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="3">
                        <p>
                           <b>SGA - weight</b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n: 785)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center" cspan="3">
                        <p>
                           <b>SGA - length</b>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                           <b>(n:784)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure period</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>OR</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Linearity (df)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>OR</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>(95% CI)</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Linearity (df)<sup>a</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Unadjusted</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.013</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.992; 1.035)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.001</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.968; 1.035)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.013</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.992; 1.034)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.006</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.972; 1.041)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.004</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.983; 1.026)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.013</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.979; 1.049)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.014</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.988; 1.040)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.010</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.970; 1.052)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="right">
                        <p>
                           <b>Adjusted<sup>b</sup></b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>First trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.182</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.894; 1.563)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.137</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.741; 1.744)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Second trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.369</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(1.013; 1.849)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.416</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.890; 2.254)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Third trimester</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.186</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.906; 1.552)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.103</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.750; 1.623)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="7">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Whole pregnancy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.281</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.942; 1.743)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.230</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>(0.778; 1.945)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>L</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p>*Estimates are expressed as the change in odds for SGA (birth weight) and SGA (birth length) for a 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>increase in the mean NO<sub>2 </sub>levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.</p>
                  <p><sup>a </sup>Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO<sub>2 </sub>in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).</p>
                  <p><sup>b </sup>Adjusted for:</p>
                  <p>-SGA in weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, country of origin, smoking during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
                  <p>-SGA in length: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal education, parity, smoking during pregnancy, gestational weight gain, country of origin, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Relationship between individual NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the second trimester and small for gestational age, in birth weight and in birth length in a multivariate analysis</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Relationship between individual NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure during the second trimester and small for gestational age, in birth weight and in birth length in a multivariate analysis</b>. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). A). Logit of small for gestational age in birth weight and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure (2 df). <it>Footnote for Figure 3(A)</it>: For SGA (in birth weight) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model. (B). Logit of small for gestational age in birth length and NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure (2 df). <it>Footnote for Figure 3(B)</it>: For SGA (in birth length) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1476-069X-9-6-3" hint_layout="single"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>Results from this mother and child cohort living in a large, heterogeneous area in Valencia, Spain, suggest an association between maternal exposure to outdoor air pollution and birth outcomes. The odds of being SGA-weight increased by 37% when ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>levels increased 10 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>during the second trimester of pregnancy. For anthropometric measures in continuous form, an association with air pollution appeared for women living in zones with ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>levels above 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>. The first and second trimesters seem to be the relevant window of exposure.</p>
         <p>Results for the different air pollutants varied in the different studies. Besides particulate matter (PM) [either of diameter &lt;10 &#956;m -PM<sub>10</sub>- or &lt;2.5 &#956;m -PM<sub>2.5</sub>-] and carbon monoxide (CO), NO<sub>2 </sub>appears as one of the pollutants more frequently associated with birth outcomes. In a previous review <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> we identified six articles reporting associations between NO<sub>x </sub>or NO<sub>2 </sub>with either birth weight, low birth weight (LBW, measured as birth weight &lt;2500 g), or SGA. The three articles that included nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>x</sub>) were ecological in design and used data from central monitors. None of them found an association between NO<sub>x </sub>and birth weight. For NO<sub>2</sub>, results from the literature reviewed suggested some association with birth weight, but were still not conclusive <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>. In recent years a considerable number of articles have been published in this field. We have identified 12 articles studying the association of NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure with birth weight that were published after our previous review (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. Of the four studies analyzing birth weight, an association was found in three of them: Bell et al. in Massachusetts and Connecticut (USA) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>, Mannes et al. in Sydney (Australia) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>, and Gouveia and cols in Brazil <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>, but no relationship was observed in the Children's Health Study <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, all but one of the articles <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp> studying SGA found an association with NO<sub>2</sub>; in the study in question, however, NO<sub>2 </sub>was the only pollutant studied to be associated with head circumference. As an example, in their study in Vancouver, Brauer et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp> estimated residential exposures to air pollution and the risk of SGA. Of the seven air pollutants studied, the association with NO<sub>2 </sub>was the most robust. On the other hand, only three studies found an association between LBW and NO<sub>2 </sub><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. This discrepancy may be due to the fact that the number of cases of SGA is greater than that of LBW term babies, which gives the study more statistical power. Moreover, the use of SGA, calculated for each week of gestation, enables the effect of gestational length to be more effectively controlled than LBW, which is estimated simply by selecting births that take place after a certain period of gestation (i.e. between weeks 37- 44).</p>
         <suppl id="S2">
            <title>
               <p>Additional file 2</p>
            </title>
            <text>
               <p><b>Results from studies assessing NO<sub>2 </sub>effect on birth weight published between 2003-2008</b>. Table summarizing the design and main results of studies published between 2003-2008 on air pollution exposure during pregnancy that included NO2 as air pollution indicator and birth weight.</p>
            </text>
            <file name="1476-069X-9-6-S2.DOC">
               <p>Click here for file</p>
            </file>
         </suppl>
         <p>Few studies have examined the relation between air pollution exposure during pregnancy and other anthropometric indicators such as birth length or head circumference (HC). Studies of two cohorts of pregnant women in Poland and in New York described a relationship between prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and fetal growth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. Regarding prenatal NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure and birth length or HC, a birth register-based study assessed birth length and HC among 26,617 term births in Brisbane, Australia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. An IQR range increase in NO<sub>2 </sub>(11.1 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>), but not in other pollutants, during the third trimester was associated with a reduction in crown-heel length: -0.15 cm (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.05). Moreover, in the French Eden cohort <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp> a reduction of -0.31 cm in HC at birth was found when comparing NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure in the highest tertile (>31.4 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>) to that in the lowest tertile. Our results are consistent with the findings of these two studies.</p>
         <p>Up to now a clear window of susceptibility for growth retardation has not been identified. In our study we found that exposure during the first trimester is most closely related to a decrease in birth weight and length. In the case of SGA (both, in weight and in length) however, the strongest relationship was found with exposure in the second trimester. Regarding reduced HC, when exposure was evaluated above vs. below 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>, exposure throughout the pregnancy was the most clearly related. This may indicate that exposure during the entire pregnancy plays the most important role for reduction in the growth of the infant head.</p>
         <p>Very few studies have completely assessed the shape of the relationship between air pollution exposure and reproductive outcomes. Instead, most have analyzed the relation using air pollution variables in the continuous form or comparing only two levels. Some have attempted to examine the shape using tertiles or quartiles and observed an increased risk of LBW at higher quartiles <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. Regarding NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure and birth weight, only Ha et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp> examined this relationship using GAM models, as did we in the present study. In the former study, although the authors considered the relationship to be relatively linear, a change in the slope may be observed in the figures, with a higher negative gradient after NO<sub>2 </sub>values of around 32 ppb (60 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>). In our study, we found some indication of a reduction in birth length starting at a threshold of approximately 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3</sup>. For HC and the risk of SGA we found a monotonic relationship with air pollution exposure.</p>
         <p>The biological mechanisms by which air pollutants may affect fetal growth are still unclear. There is some evidence that NO<sub>2 </sub>alters fetal growth and thus may play a causal role. NO<sub>2 </sub>is a potent oxidant and increased lipid peroxidation in the maternal and/or fetal compartment has been found in preterm births <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Tabacova et al. investigated the relationship between exposure to nitrogen-oxidizing species and pregnancy complications in an area in Bulgaria highly polluted by oxidized nitrogen compounds <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. Methemoglobin, a biomarker of individual exposure, was determined, and glutathione balance and lipid peroxide levels were used as measures of oxidant/antioxidant status. A high percentage of women suffered from pregnancy complications, the most common being anaemia (67%), threatened abortion/premature labour (33%), and signs of preeclampsia (23%). Methemoglobin was significantly elevated in all three conditions, in comparison with normal pregnancies. Reduced:total glutathione, an indicator of maternal antioxidant reserves, decreased, whereas cell-damaging lipid peroxide levels increased. More recently, Mohoroviz found similar results for methemoglobin in a polluted area of Croatia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>. These results suggest that maternal exposure to environmental oxidants can increase the risk of pregnancy complications through stimulation of methemoglobin formation, which may lead to hypoxia and hypoxemia in pregnant women and has an important influence on maternal health as well as on placental and fetal development.</p>
         <p>Our study has several limitations. The number of women participating in the study is small compared with that in other studies. Subsequently, the power of the study is fairly low and the estimates have wide confidence intervals. In addition, we had no information available on other important pollutants such as PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>), and CO, for which some associations with fetal growth have been described in other studies. Consequently, we cannot affirm that NO<sub>2 </sub>is the air pollutant definitively associated with birth measurements. Due to the colinearity between pollutants, NO<sub>2 </sub>may simply be a proxy for other toxins. Still, NO<sub>2 </sub>has been shown to be a marker of air pollution from road traffic <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp> and could be a reasonable marker of ultrafine particulates or PAH from this source. Unfortunately, we did not have information on indoor levels of air pollutants. However we did have information on environmental tobacco smoke exposure, an important source of indoor air pollution, and we controlled for this.</p>
         <p>Notwithstanding the aforementioned weaknesses, our study has several important strengths. In this prospective study we followed a pregnant cohort from early pregnancy and assessed exposure, health outcomes, and covariates in great detail. In addition, the statistical approach using GAM models allows us to examine the shape of the relationship while the use of robust methods permits the minimization of the influence of extreme values. Moreover, we developed a protocol combining measurements from NO<sub>2 </sub>passive samplers, kriging, and LUR in order to obtain estimates of individual exposure to ambient NO<sub>2 </sub>for each woman. We also performed four different campaigns to assess the stability over time of the spatial NO<sub>2 </sub>distribution in the study area, as recommended by Ritz and Wilhelm <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. Our method allowed us to address local heterogeneity in order to assign an individual estimate of the exposure, a problem that has been reported to affect other studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. Lastly, our study had access to detailed information about each woman's residence throughout pregnancy, including changes of location and address.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusions</p>
         </st>
         <p>Findings from this mother and birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain, suggest that prenatal exposure to outdoor air pollution, measured as NO<sub>2</sub>, affects the anthropometric development of the fetus, reducing its length and head circumference and increasing the risk of having a small for gestational age (in weight) baby.</p>
         <p>We found an association between exposure to levels of NO<sub>2 </sub>above 40 &#956;g/m<sup>3 </sup>during the first trimester of pregnancy and a reduction in birth weight. This association was only marginal for birth length.</p>
         <p>For head circumference (HC) reduction and the risk of SGA, a monotonic relationship with air pollution exposure was observed. The relevant period of exposure for the risk of SGA was the second trimester. Exposure throughout the pregnancy played the most important role in decreased HC.</p>
         <p>Compared with other recent studies, NO<sub>2 </sub>levels in the study area occupy an intermediate position; therefore, the results are not due to extreme exposure conditions. Taking into account the relationship between fetal growth reduction and child development and health, strategies should be developed to reduce air pollution in order to prevent these risks.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Abbreviations</p>
         </st>
         <p>BMI: Body mass index; BSP: Black smoke particles; CI: confidence interval; CO: carbon monoxide; GAM: generalized additive models; GIS: geographical information system; HC: head circumference; INMA: Spanish Children's Health and Environment study; IQR: Interquartile range; LBW: low birth weight (measured as birth weight &lt;2500 g); LR: likelihood ratio; LUR: land use regression; NO<sub>2</sub>: nitrogen dioxide; NO<sub>x</sub>: nitrogen oxides; OR: odds ratio; PAH: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PM: particulate matter; PM<sub>10</sub>: particulate matter of diameter &lt;10 &#956;m; PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter of diameter &lt;2.5 &#956;m; ppb: parts per billion; PR: prevalence ratio; SES: socio-economic status; SGA: small for gestational age; SO<sub>2</sub>: sulphur dioxide.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>Authors contributed to the article as follows: FB conceived the study, supervised the data collection and data analysis, and prepared the manuscript. ME contributed to data collection, conducted the data analysis of the association of interest, and helped with manuscript preparation. CI prepared the outcome variables, developed the land use regression analysis, assisted with data analysis, and helped with data interpretation and manuscript preparation. SL, AE, RR, ML, and MR contributed to data collection, provided critical revision of the manuscript, and helped with data interpretation and manuscript preparation. All authors have read and given final approval of the version to be published.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>The authors give special thanks to the families in the study as well as to the professionals that gave their support to this study.</p>
            <p>Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (G03/176), FIS-FEDER 03/1615, 04/1509, 04/1112 and 06/1213, and the Conselleria de Sanitat Generalitat Valenciana; all in Spain.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sram</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Binkova</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dejmek</snm>
                  <fnm/>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bobak</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>113</volume>
            <fpage>375</fpage>
            <lpage>382</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1278474</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">15811825</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health effects</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lacasana</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Esplugues</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ballester</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Eur J Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <fpage>183</fpage>
            <lpage>199</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10654-004-3005-9</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15792286</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal growth</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maisonet</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Correa</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Misra</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jaakkola</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Res</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>95</volume>
            <fpage>106</fpage>
            <lpage>115</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2004.01.001</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15068936</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Glinianaia</snm>
                  <fnm>SV</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rankin</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bell</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pless-Mulloli</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Howel</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Epidemiology</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <fpage>36</fpage>
            <lpage>45</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ede.0000101023.41844.ac</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14712145</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Birth weight, postnatal growth and cognitive function in a national UK birth cohort</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Richards</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hardy</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kuh</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wadsworth</snm>
                  <fnm>ME</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <fpage>342</fpage>
            <lpage>348</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/ije/31.2.342</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11980795</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>The origins of the developmental origins theory</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barker</snm>
                  <fnm>DJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Intern Med</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>261</volume>
            <fpage>412</fpage>
            <lpage>417</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17444880</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and reproductive health</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woodruff</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Parker</snm>
                  <fnm>JD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Darrow</snm>
                  <fnm>LA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Slama</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bell</snm>
                  <fnm>ML</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Choi</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Glinianaia</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoggatt</snm>
                  <fnm>KJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Karr</snm>
                  <fnm>CJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lobdell</snm>
                  <fnm>DT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilhelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Res</source>
            <pubdate>2009</pubdate>
            <volume>109</volume>
            <fpage>311</fpage>
            <lpage>320</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.012</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">19215915</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilhelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ritz</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>111</volume>
            <fpage>207</fpage>
            <lpage>216</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1241352</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">12573907</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Parker</snm>
                  <fnm>JD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woodruff</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Basu</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schoendorf</snm>
                  <fnm>KC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Pediatrics</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>115</volume>
            <fpage>121</fpage>
            <lpage>128</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15629991</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bell</snm>
                  <fnm>ML</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ebisu</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Belanger</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>115</volume>
            <fpage>1118</fpage>
            <lpage>1124</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1913584</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">17637932</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perera</snm>
                  <fnm>FP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rauh</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tsai</snm>
                  <fnm>WY</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kinney</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Camann</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barr</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bernert</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Garfinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tu</snm>
                  <fnm>YH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Diaz</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dietrich</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Whyatt</snm>
                  <fnm>RM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>111</volume>
            <fpage>201</fpage>
            <lpage>206</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1241351</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">12573906</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring's term birth weight: a study relying on a land-use regression exposure model</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Slama</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morgenstern</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cyrys</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zutavern</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Herbarth</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wichmann</snm>
                  <fnm>HE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heinrich</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>115</volume>
            <fpage>1283</fpage>
            <lpage>1292</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1964922</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">17805417</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Choi</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rauh</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Garfinkel</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perera</snm>
                  <fnm>FP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <fpage>658</fpage>
            <lpage>665</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2367680</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">18470316</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Comparing exposure metrics in the relationship between PM<sub>2.5 </sub>and birth weight in California</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Basu</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woodruff</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Parker</snm>
                  <fnm>JD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Saulnier</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schoendorf</snm>
                  <fnm>KC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <fpage>391</fpage>
            <lpage>396</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.jea.7500336</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15361898</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ritz</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilhelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>102</volume>
            <fpage>182</fpage>
            <lpage>190</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18226073</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Meeting report: atmospheric pollution and human reproduction</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Slama</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Darrow</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Parker</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woodruff</snm>
                  <fnm>TJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Strickland</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nieuwenhuijsen</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Glinianaia</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hoggatt</snm>
                  <fnm>KJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kannan</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hurley</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kalinka</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sr&#225;m</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brauer</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilhelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heinrich</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ritz</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <fpage>791</fpage>
            <lpage>798</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2430236</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">18560536</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>Traffic-related air pollution and asthma onset in children: a prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jerrett</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shankardass</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Berhane</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gauderman</snm>
                  <fnm>WJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kunzli</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Avol</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gilliland</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lurmann</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Molitor</snm>
                  <fnm>JN</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Molitor</snm>
                  <fnm>JT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thomas</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Peters</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>McConnell</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <fpage>1433</fpage>
            <lpage>1438</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2569108</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">18941591</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>Health effects of air pollution observed in cohort studies in Europe</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brunekreef</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <issue>Suppl 2</issue>
            <fpage>S61</fpage>
            <lpage>S65</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.jes.7500628</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18079765</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Child health and the environment: the INMA Spanish Study</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ribas-Fito</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ramon</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ballester</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Grimalt</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Marco</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Olea</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Posada</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rebagliato</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tardon</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Torrent</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sunyer</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <fpage>403</fpage>
            <lpage>410</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00745.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16911019</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>Secular trends in birth weight, BMI, and diabetes in the offspring of diabetic mothers</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lindsay</snm>
                  <fnm>RS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hanson</snm>
                  <fnm>RL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bennett</snm>
                  <fnm>PH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Knowler</snm>
                  <fnm>WC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Diabetes Care</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <fpage>1249</fpage>
            <lpage>1254</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.2337/diacare.23.9.1249</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10977014</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>[Anthropometric growth patterns of preterm and full-term newborns (24-42 weeks' gestational age) at the Hospital Materno-Infantil Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona)(1997-2002]</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carrascosa</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yeste</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Copil</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Almar</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salcedo</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gussinye</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>An Pediatr (Barc)</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>60</volume>
            <fpage>406</fpage>
            <lpage>416</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1157/13059643</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15104995</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Estimation of personal NO<sub>2 </sub>exposure in a cohort of pregnant women</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>I&#241;iguez</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ballester</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Estarlich</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fernandez-Patier</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Aguirre-Alfaro</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Esplugues</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <cnm>INMA Study group Valencia</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Sci Total Environ</source>
            <pubdate>2009</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <fpage>6093</fpage>
            <lpage>6099</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.006</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Pregnancy weight gain: still controversial</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Abrams</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Altman</snm>
                  <fnm>SL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pickett</snm>
                  <fnm>KE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am J Clin Nutr</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>71</volume>
            <issue>Suppl 5</issue>
            <fpage>S1233</fpage>
            <lpage>S1241</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p/>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <cnm>World Health Organization</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005</source>
            <publisher>Geneva, Switzerland: WHO</publisher>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <fpage>15</fpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>Is air pollution a risk factor for low birth weight in Seoul?</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ha</snm>
                  <fnm>EH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hong</snm>
                  <fnm>YC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lee</snm>
                  <fnm>BE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Woo</snm>
                  <fnm>BH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schwartz</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Christiani</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Epidemiology</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <fpage>643</fpage>
            <lpage>648</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/00001648-200111000-00011</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11679791</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maroziene</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Grazuleviciene</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <fpage>6</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-069X-1-6</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">149395</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12495448</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liu</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Krewski</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shi</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Burnett</snm>
                  <fnm>RT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>111</volume>
            <fpage>1773</fpage>
            <lpage>1778</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1241722</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">14594630</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <title>
               <p>Exposure to air pollution during different gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lee</snm>
                  <fnm>BE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ha</snm>
                  <fnm>EH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Park</snm>
                  <fnm>HS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kim</snm>
                  <fnm>YJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hong</snm>
                  <fnm>YC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kim</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lee</snm>
                  <fnm>JT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Hum Reprod</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>18</volume>
            <fpage>638</fpage>
            <lpage>643</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/humrep/deg102</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12615838</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Sao Paulo, Brazil</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gouveia</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bremner</snm>
                  <fnm>SA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Novaes</snm>
                  <fnm>HM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Epidemiol Community Health</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <fpage>11</fpage>
            <lpage>17</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/jech.58.1.11</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1757020</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14684720</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilhelm</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ritz</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>113</volume>
            <fpage>1212</fpage>
            <lpage>1221</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1280404</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">16140630</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Salam</snm>
                  <fnm>MT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Millstein</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Li</snm>
                  <fnm>YF</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Margolis</snm>
                  <fnm>HG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gilliland</snm>
                  <fnm>FD</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>113</volume>
            <fpage>1638</fpage>
            <lpage>1644</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1310931</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">16263524</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>Impact of ambient air pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mannes</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jalaludin</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Morgan</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lincoln</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sheppeard</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Corbett</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Occup Environ Med</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>62</volume>
            <fpage>524</fpage>
            <lpage>530</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1136/oem.2004.014282</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1741072</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16046604</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <title>
               <p>Association between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liu</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Krewski</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Shi</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chen</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Burnett</snm>
                  <fnm>RT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <fpage>426</fpage>
            <lpage>432</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.jes.7500503</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16736056</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B34">
            <title>
               <p>Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hansen</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Neller</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williams</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Simpson</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>BJOG</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>113</volume>
            <fpage>935</fpage>
            <lpage>941</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01010.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16907939</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B35">
            <title>
               <p>A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brauer</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lencar</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tamburic</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koehoorn</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Demers</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Karr</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>116</volume>
            <fpage>680</fpage>
            <lpage>686</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2367679</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">18470315</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B36">
            <title>
               <p>Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hansen</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Neller</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williams</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Simpson</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Res</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>103</volume>
            <fpage>383</fpage>
            <lpage>389</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.010</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16890220</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B37">
            <title>
               <p>International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Choi</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jedrychowski</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Spengler</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Camann</snm>
                  <fnm>DE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Whyatt</snm>
                  <fnm>RM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rauh</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tsai</snm>
                  <fnm>WY</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perera</snm>
                  <fnm>FP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>114</volume>
            <fpage>1744</fpage>
            <lpage>1750</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1665416</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">17107862</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B38">
            <title>
               <p>Relation between atmospheric pollutants and head circumference in utero and at birth: a cohort study relying on ultrasound imaging during pregnancy</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Slama</snm>
                  <fnm>RS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sinno-Teller</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thi&#233;baugeorges</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Goua</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Forhan</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ducot</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Annesi-Maesano</snm>
                  <fnm>I</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heinrich</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schweitzer</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Magnin</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bouyer</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kaminski</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Charles</snm>
                  <fnm>MA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <cnm>Eden Study Group</cnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Epidemiology</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <fpage>S129</fpage>
            <lpage>S130</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1097/01.ede.0000221781.15114.88</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B39">
            <title>
               <p>Induction of lipid peroxidation of pulmonary surfactant by plasma of preterm babies</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moison</snm>
                  <fnm>RM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Palinckx</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Roest</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Houdkamp</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Berger</snm>
                  <fnm>HM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Lancet</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>341</volume>
            <fpage>79</fpage>
            <lpage>82</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0140-6736(93)92557-A</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8093405</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B40">
            <title>
               <p>Maternal exposure to exogenous nitrogen compounds and complications of pregnancy</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tabacova</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Balabaeva</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Little</snm>
                  <fnm>RE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Arch Environ Health</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>52</volume>
            <fpage>341</fpage>
            <lpage>347</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/00039899709602209</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">9546756</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B41">
            <title>
               <p>The level of maternal methemoglobin during pregnancy in an air-polluted environment</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mohorovic</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health Perspect</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>111</volume>
            <fpage>1902</fpage>
            <lpage>1905</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1241764</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">14644664</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B42">
            <title>
               <p>Land use regression modeling of intra-urban residential variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clougherty</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wright</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baxter</snm>
                  <fnm>LK</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Levy</snm>
                  <fnm>JI</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Environ Health</source>
            <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <fpage>17</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1476-069X-7-17</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">2397396</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18485201</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>

