Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Zev Ross |
17 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dane westerdahl |
22 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esben Budtz-Jørgensen |
29 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Trupin |
29 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Gary Adamkiewicz |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Gary Adamkiewicz |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Trupin |
14 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dane westerdahl |
15 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Zev Ross |
28 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esben Budtz-Jørgensen |
29 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Gary Adamkiewicz |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Gary Adamkiewicz |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Gary Adamkiewicz |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
17 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-9-73 |
You can find further information about peer review here.