Table 2 |
|||||
|
Geocoding Results after E911 Conversion. |
|||||
|
TeleAtlas |
ArcView/NAVTEQ |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Address status |
N |
Error1 |
N (%)2 |
Error1 |
N (%)2 |
|
|
|||||
|
Converted Pre-E911 Street |
35 |
373 (204, 629) |
20 (57%) |
20 (15, 58) |
35 (100%) |
|
Converted Rural Route Boxes |
24 |
280 (80, 2362) |
11 (46%) |
60 (24, 200) |
24 (100%) |
|
Total Addresses3 |
135 |
188 (77, 434) |
85 (63%) |
39 (16, 73) |
130 (96%) |
|
|
|||||
|
1Positional errors are presented as median distance (25th, 75th percentile) in meters between geocoded location and GPS measurements. 2Represents the number of successfully geocoded addresses and the percent (%). 3Includes the results for the 71 self-reported post-E911 street addresses and the 2 self-reported pre-E911 street addresses that were not converted. The 1 PO Box was not geocoded by either method. |
|||||
|
Vieira et al. Environmental Health 2010 9:18 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-18 |
|||||
