Environmental Health

official impact factor 2.45

Open Access Highly Access Research

Spatial analysis of air pollution and childhood asthma in Hamilton, Canada: comparing exposure methods in sensitive subgroups

Talar Sahsuvaroglu1*, Michael Jerrett2, Malcolm R Sears3, Rob McConnell4, Norm Finkelstein1, Altaf Arain1, Bruce Newbold1 and Rick Burnett5

Author Affiliations

1 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, 1280 King St West, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Canada

2 School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 140 Warren Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7360, USA

3 Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada

4 Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-9010, USA

5 Biostatistics and Epidemiology Division, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0T6, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Environmental Health 2009, 8:14 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-14

Published: 1 April 2009

Abstract

Background

Variations in air pollution exposure within a community may be associated with asthma prevalence. However, studies conducted to date have produced inconsistent results, possibly due to errors in measurement of the exposures.

Methods

A standardized asthma survey was administered to children in grades one and eight in Hamilton, Canada, in 1994–95 (N ~1467). Exposure to air pollution was estimated in four ways: (1) distance from roadways; (2) interpolated surfaces for ozone, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and nitrous oxides from seven to nine governmental monitoring stations; (3) a kriged nitrogen dioxide (NO2) surface based on a network of 100 passive NO2 monitors; and (4) a land use regression (LUR) model derived from the same monitoring network. Logistic regressions were used to test associations between asthma and air pollution, controlling for variables including neighbourhood income, dwelling value, state of housing, a deprivation index and smoking.

Results

There were no significant associations between any of the exposure estimates and asthma in the whole population, but large effects were detected the subgroup of children without hayfever (predominately in girls). The most robust effects were observed for the association of asthma without hayfever and NO2LUR OR = 1.86 (95%CI, 1.59–2.16) in all girls and OR = 2.98 (95%CI, 0.98–9.06) for older girls, over an interquartile range increase and controlling for confounders.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that traffic-related pollutants, such as NO2, are associated with asthma without overt evidence of other atopic disorders among female children living in a medium-sized Canadian city. The effects were sensitive to the method of exposure estimation. More refined exposure models produced the most robust associations.