Table 1

PCE concentrations (ug/L) measured in water samples according to characteristics of sampling location and methods


No. of Samples
No. With NDa Level
Percent With NDa Level
Meanb
Median
75th Percentile
Range

All Samples
88
43
49
66
0.5
32
ND-2432








According to:







Complexity of pipe configurationc







     Simple
31
13
42
73
20
50
ND-780
     Complex
57
30
53
63
ND
22
ND-2432
Magnitude of flowc







     High (> 19 homes)
19
11
58
10
ND
20
ND-59
     Medium (3–19 homes)
33
22
67
18
ND
20
ND-190
     Low (< = 2 homes)
36
10
28
141
18
57
ND-2432
Position along pipec







     End
44
16
36
56
12
37
ND-780
     Beginning/Middle
44
27
61
77
ND
25
ND-2432
Overestimated housing densityc







     Yes
25
11
44
182
6.6
38
ND-2432
     No
63
32
51
20
ND
28
ND-235
Season sampledc







     Spring
74
42
57
77
ND
38
ND-2432
     Autumn
14
1
7
7.7
4.6
11
ND-44
Water fixture sampledc







     Tap or spigot
10
3
30
302
32
190
ND-2432
     Hydrant
18
7
39
26
21
35
ND-92
     Unknown
60
33
55
39
ND
18
ND-780
Sampling personnelc







     Sampler 1
69
33
48
38
0.5
31
ND-780
     Sampler 2
18
10
56
43
ND
28
ND-350
     Sampler 3
1
0
0
2432
---d
---d
---d
Townc







     Barnstable
7
7
100
ND
ND
ND
ND-ND
     Bourne
16
10
63
57
ND
26
ND-540
     Brewster
7
2
29
140
32
100
ND-780
     Chatham
6
5
83
4.9
ND
ND
ND-28
     Falmouth
6
1
17
47
53
62
ND-75
     Provincetown
5
5
100
ND
ND
ND
ND-ND
     Sandwich
9
3
33
36
22
59
ND-92
     Plymouth
25
7
28
128
3.1
13
ND-2432
     Wareham
7
3
43
15
20
28
ND-35
Pipe installation yearc







     1968–1972
23
16
70
38
ND
1
ND-780
     1973–1976
32
15
47
18
4.6
25
ND-100
     1977–1980
33
12
36
134
22
59
ND-2432

a ND – Not Detected. The detection limit was 0.5 μg/L.

b Means were calculated using 0.25 μg/L (half the detection limit) for ND samples.

c See text for definitions and further description.

d Analyses were not conducted.

Spence et al. Environmental Health 2008 7:24   doi:10.1186/1476-069X-7-24