|
Engine size, fuel efficiency and emissions data for advertised vehicles by year and magazine (2001–2005) |
||||||||
| Year/magazine |
Engine sizea |
Fuel efficiencyb c |
Greenhouse ratingb d |
Air pollutionb d |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
| Mean capacity (L) |
N |
(L/100 km) |
N |
Mean rating |
N |
Mean rating |
N |
|
|
|
||||||||
| 2001 |
2.51 |
23 |
9.9 |
66 |
5.1 |
43 |
5.5 |
45 |
| 2002 |
2.37 |
25 |
9.3 |
59 |
5.5 |
39 |
5.5 |
39 |
| 2003 |
2.76 |
37 |
10.0 |
103 |
5.0 |
77 |
5.1 |
77 |
| 2004 |
2.77 |
64 |
10.1 |
161 |
5.0 |
124 |
5.5 |
124 |
| 2005 |
2.98 |
51 |
9.8 |
117 |
5.3 |
99 |
5.4 |
99 |
| Metro |
2.64 |
98 |
9.8 |
277 |
5.2 |
213 |
5.4 |
214 |
| North & South |
2.84 |
102 |
10.1 |
229 |
5.0 |
169 |
5.3 |
170 |
|
|
||||||||
| Total |
2.74 |
200 |
9.9 |
506 |
5.1 |
382 |
5.4 |
384 |
|
a "Engine size" taken from actual advertisements. b Data collection was attempted for all different vehicles (n = 149) and when available it was then extrapolated to the advertisements shown in the magazines. c "Fuel efficiency" for the advertised vehicles was obtained from an official New Zealand website [9]. d "Greenhouse" and "Air Pollution" ratings are on a scale from 0.5 (worst, most polluting) to 10 (best) based on their CO2 emissions and other air pollutant emissions. These were obtained from an official Australian website [10]. | ||||||||
Wilson et al. Environmental Health 2008 7:14 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-7-14 |
||||||||