|
Aged-standardized admissions ratio* (and 95% confidence interval) of Windsor and Sarnia compared to London. |
||||||
| Windsor |
All Admissions |
|||||
|
|
||||||
| 1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
||
|
|
||||||
| Male |
1.49 (1.45, 1.54) |
1.53 (1.48, 1.57) |
1.57 (1.52, 1.61) |
1.46 (1.42, 1.50) |
1.38 1.34, 1.42) |
|
| Female |
1.63 (1.59, 1.68) |
1.64 (1.59, 1.69) |
1.74 (1.69, 1.79) |
1.63 1.58, 1.68) |
1.64 (1.59, 1.69) |
|
|
|
||||||
| Sarnia |
Male |
1.71 (1.60, 1.76) |
1.73 (1.65, 1.81) |
1.73 (1.65, 1.81) |
1.47 (1.40, 1.54) |
1.61 (1.53, 1.69) |
| Female |
1.90 (1.87, 2.05) |
1.86 (1.77, 1.95) |
1.94 (1.84, 2.03) |
1.76 (1.67, 1.85) |
1.82 (1.73, 1.91) |
|
|
|
||||||
| All Cardiovascular Admissions |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| 1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
||
|
|
||||||
| Windsor |
Male |
1.37 (1.30, 1.44) |
1.51 (1.44, 1.59) |
1.50 (1.42, 1.57) |
1.36 (1.29, 1.43) |
1.44 (1.37, 1.52) |
| Female |
1.67 (1.58, 1.76) |
1.71 (1.62, 1.80) |
1.88 (1.78, 1.99) |
1.79 (1.64, 1.83) |
1.85 (1.76, 1.95) |
|
|
|
||||||
| Sarnia |
Male |
1.78 (1.65, 1.92) |
1.85 (1.71, 2.00) |
2.01 (1.86, 2.16) |
1.58 (1.45, 1.70) |
1.91 (1.77, 2.06) |
| Female |
2.33 (2.15, 2.52) |
2.16 (1.99, 2.34) |
2.28 (2.10, 2.48) |
2.18 (2.00, 2.37) |
2.34 (2.15, 2.53) |
|
|
|
||||||
| All Respiratory Admissions |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| 1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
||
|
|
||||||
| Windsor |
Male |
2.19 (2.05, 2.35) |
1.98 (1.85, 2.13) |
1.96 (1.83, 2.10) |
2.05 (1.92, 2.20) |
1.63 (1.50, 1.76) |
| Female |
2.10 (1.95, 2.25) |
1.84 (1.71, 1.99) |
1.92 (1.79, 2.06) |
1.87 (1.74, 2.00) |
1.31 (1.21, 1.41) |
|
|
|
||||||
| Sarnia |
Male |
2.83 (2.54, 3.14) |
2.29 (2.03, 2.57) |
2.15 (1.91, 2.42) |
2.19 (1.95, 2.47) |
1.94 (1.70, 2.19) |
| Female |
3.11 (2.80, 3.44) |
2.60 (2.31, 2.92) |
2.27 (2.02, 2.55) |
1.69 (1.48, 1.92) |
2.02 (1.77, 2.30) |
|
|
* SAR= observed admissions/expected admissions calculated from age-specific rates of London | ||||||
Fung et al. Environmental Health 2007 6:18 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-6-18 |
||||||