Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessMethodology

Cluster detection methods applied to the Upper Cape Cod cancer data

Al Ozonoff1 email, Thomas Webster2 email, Veronica Vieira2 email, Janice Weinberg1 email, David Ozonoff2 email and Ann Aschengrau3 email

Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

author email corresponding author email

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 2005, 4:19doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-19

Published: 15 September 2005

Abstract

Background

A variety of statistical methods have been suggested to assess the degree and/or the location of spatial clustering of disease cases. However, there is relatively little in the literature devoted to comparison and critique of different methods. Most of the available comparative studies rely on simulated data rather than real data sets.

Methods

We have chosen three methods currently used for examining spatial disease patterns: the M-statistic of Bonetti and Pagano; the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) method as applied by Webster; and Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic. We apply these statistics to analyze breast cancer data from the Upper Cape Cancer Incidence Study using three different latency assumptions.

Results

The three different latency assumptions produced three different spatial patterns of cases and controls. For 20 year latency, all three methods generally concur. However, for 15 year latency and no latency assumptions, the methods produce different results when testing for global clustering.

Conclusion

The comparative analyses of real data sets by different statistical methods provides insight into directions for further research. We suggest a research program designed around examining real data sets to guide focused investigation of relevant features using simulated data, for the purpose of understanding how to interpret statistical methods applied to epidemiological data with a spatial component.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.