Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Kriebel |
| 2 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Watterson |
| 24 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kelly Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 7 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Kriebel |
| 22 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kelly Scanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 22 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-12-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.