Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
| 14 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JG Brody |
| 24 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Infante |
| 8 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JG Brody |
| 30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Infante |
| 2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
| 5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau |
| 6 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 6 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - James Brophy |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 6 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-11-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.