Environmental Health

official impact factor 2.45

Open Access Research

Municipal bylaw to reduce cosmetic/non-essential pesticide use on household lawns - a policy implementation evaluation

Donald C Cole1*, Loren Vanderlinden1,2, Jessica Leah1, Rich Whate2, Carol Mee2, Monica Bienefeld3, Susitha Wanigaratne1 and Monica Campbell1,2

Author Affiliations

1 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, Ste 400, 155 College St. Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada

2 Healthy Public Policy, Toronto Public Health, City of Toronto, 277 Victoria Street, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W2, Canada

3 Public Health Policy and Programs Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care,1075 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 2B1, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Environmental Health 2011, 10:74 doi:10.1186/1476-069X-10-74

Published: 25 August 2011

Abstract

Background

Pesticide use on urban lawns and gardens contributes to environmental contamination and human exposure. Municipal policies to restrict use and educate households on viable alternatives deserve study. We describe the development and implementation of a cosmetic/non-essential pesticide bylaw by a municipal health department in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and assess changes in resident practices associated with bylaw implementation.

Methods

Implementation indicators built on a logic model and were elaborated through key informant interviews. Bylaw impacts on awareness and practice changes were documented through telephone surveys administered seasonally pre, during and post implementation (2003-2008). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations of demographic variables and gardening season with respondent awareness and practices.

Results

Implementation indicators documented multiple municipal health department activities and public involvement in complaints from commencement of the educational phase. During the enforcement phases only 40 warning letters and 7 convictions were needed. The number of lawn care companies increased. Among survey respondents, awareness of the bylaw and the Natural Lawn campaign reached 69% and 76% respectively by 2008. Substantial decreases in the proportion of households applying pesticides (25 to 11%) or hiring lawn care companies for application (15 to 5%) occurred. Parallel absolute increases in use of natural lawn care methods occurred among households themselves (21%) and companies they contracted (7%).

Conclusions

Bylaws or ordinances implemented through education and enforcement are a viable policy option for reducing urban cosmetic pesticide use.