Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Persky |
| 30 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Ericson Jogsten |
| 15 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnold Schecter |
| 18 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olivier Humblet |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Ericson Jogsten |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnold Schecter |
| 28 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olivier Humblet |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olivier Humblet |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Olivier Humblet |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-62 |
You can find further information about peer review here.